Comind.work is a coordination platform for enterprises. We build systems that manage handoffs, approvals, and commitments across your fragmented tools.
Salesforce owns your sales process. Jira owns your delivery. The coordination between them? That lives in spreadsheets and email threads.
"Who owes what to whom, by when - and where is it stuck?"
Your most expensive people spend their days chasing updates, sitting in status meetings, and manually stitching work together across silos.
Coordination waste = $150K+/year per department
Despite millions spent on enterprise software, the real process lives in spreadsheets that someone updates manually every Monday morning.
Your tools don't coordinate. They create silos with APIs.
Sales Silo
Deals, forecasts, contacts
The Gap
Handoffs, commitments, exceptions
"Who told the customer what?"
Operations Silo
Delivery, fulfillment, support
This is a coordination problem, not a tool problem. You can't solve it by buying another tool that creates another silo.
The Solution
We don't just give you another tool. We help you design how your teams should coordinate - then build a system that makes it happen.
Coordination design
Before writing any code, we map who owes what to whom - using ontology-inspired patterns that model commitments, actors, and handoffs explicitly.
Every promise tracked: who, what, when, to whom
Sales → Ops → Finance - nothing falls through
Escalations, re-negotiations, approvals - all visible
Execution engine
The coordination model runs on our hybrid low-code platform - connecting your existing tools instead of replacing them.
Business experts adjust flows; developers extend with code
CRM, ERP, Jira stay - we orchestrate between them
Your data, your infrastructure, your rules
We bring pre-engineered coordination patterns drawn from Enterprise Ontology - the study of how organizations actually coordinate work, not how tools assume they do: approval chains, cross-team handoffs, vendor changes, customer lifecycle flows. Customized for your specific coordination needs.
How we work
Every engagement starts with one painful coordination failure. We fix it, prove the value, then expand.
We tackle one specific coordination failure - Sales-to-Ops handoff, vendor onboarding, approval chains.
Investment
$15-30K
Working system in 21 days, full production delivery in 60-90 days
The pilot becomes a production system. Your team takes ownership, maintains it, extends it. We train, support, and help you expand.
Platform + Support
$75-150K/year
Scaled by deployment
As systems run, patterns emerge: bottleneck detection, coordination maps, early warning signals. Visibility you never had before.
Built-in
Running systems
Emerges over time
For the cost of one failed project, you can fix the underlying coordination. One major project that slips 3 months costs more than a year of Comind.work.
Mental model: "What does mis-coordination actually cost you?"
The Independence Guarantee
We keep improving your coordination with new insights - or you can take it forward on your own. Either way, you're never locked out of your own coordination history.
Full data sovereignty. Export everything, anytime. No analytics on your business logic. No training AI on your workflows.
Cloud-hosted for speed, self-hosted for control, air-gapped for sensitive units. Mix and match as your organization requires.
Standard code output. When you're ready, your developers maintain and extend the system without us.
Most enterprise software traps you: your process logic lives in their cloud, switching costs grow every year, and "pay us or lose access" becomes the unspoken reality. We invert that relationship. You own your data, you choose your deployment, and you're never held hostage to access your own work.
Credibility comes from honesty about limits.
We don't scrape your Slack, parse your emails, or build dossiers on individuals. Coordination visibility means seeing flows, not surveilling people.
No productivity scores. No "time in app" metrics. We track commitments and handoffs, not mouse movements or keystrokes.
AI helps where it adds value - but it doesn't magically fix coordination. You need a coordination model first. AI can surface patterns and automate decisions, grounded in real data from real systems.
Your coordination model is yours. We co-create it based on how you actually work, not impose a "best practice" template that ignores your context.
We focus on improving flows, not policing individuals. Psychological safety is built into how we design coordination visibility.
Coordination Wins
These aren't hypotheticals. They're results from organizations that fixed their coordination gaps.
Managers stopped spending half their day tracking down status updates. Commitments visible in one place.
Six disconnected tools consolidated into one coordination layer. No more "which system has the truth?"
Sales-to-Ops handoff that used to lose deals every month now runs automatically with full context transfer.
Complex approval chains that took 2 weeks now complete in 3 days. Bottlenecks visible before they block.
Internal team maintains and extends the system. No permanent consulting dependency. True capability transfer.
Every commitment, handoff, and exception logged. Compliance evidence generated automatically, not assembled in panic.
Start with one painful coordination failure. Working system in 21 days, full production delivery in 60-90 days.